Communication, territory,
and counter-document

Videocartografías Comunitarias emerges from a double crisis: the crisis of documentary as a regime of truth and the crisis of authorship as the guarantor of narrative. Following the ethical rupture opened by earlier documentary work, the project shifts the central question from how to represent the other to who has the right to produce the document, from where memory is constructed, and who decides what becomes history.

​

Developed in the Colombian context of 2011–2012—marked by armed conflict, forced displacement, urban segregation, and the saturation of official narratives—the project does not seek to “document violence” as a genre. Instead, it proposes a participatory dispositif through which communities can construct their own audiovisual cartographies and exercise narrative sovereignty over their territories.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​​

​

​

​

​

​

Medellín as laboratory: Moravia and Comuna 13

​

A key moment occurs during the Video Cartografía Metropolitana workshop at LabSurLab (2011), based at the Museo de Arte Moderno de Medellín and the Moravia Cultural Center. Working alongside collectives such as Platohedro, Antena Mutante, Geomalla, Fractalab, and other networks from the Global South, the project adopts a nomadic methodology grounded in situated practice.

​

Moravia—built atop a former garbage dump—and Comuna 13—marked by guerrilla presence, paramilitary control, and military operations such as Operación Orión—function as territories where violence, displacement, and creativity coexist. Guided by local hip-hop collectives, activists, and residents, video cartography becomes a way to map not only conflict, but also everyday life, resistance, and communal imagination.

​

The workshop results in twelve geolocated videos addressing militarization, poverty, displacement, and urban resistance, embedded within a critical digital map of Medellín.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

VCC Latente: mapping a displaced country

​

Following this experience, Videocartografía Comunitaria – Ciudad Latente (VCC Latente) develops as an independent project supported by the Ministry of Culture’s Digital Culture Fellowship (2011). Over six months, the project travels through urban and rural territories deeply affected by displacement and inequality, including Cali, Murillo (Tolima), Chinchiná (Caldas), and Quibdó (Chocó).

​

Rather than reproducing the dominant visual economy of war—centered on corpses, combat, and spectacle—the project foregrounds everyday practices: work, music, food, movement, learning, and social bonds. Violence remains present, but it does not monopolize representation. The aesthetic and ethical decision is to affirm life as a legitimate subject of narration.

​

The platform is structured around four categories—Economy, Projects, Meeting Points, and People—which function as analytical lenses for reading territory through lived practices rather than victimhood.

​

​

Methodology: from idea-maps to digital cartography

​

The project develops a set of specific methodologies:

​

• Script–idea mapping: narratives emerge from collective diagrams of territory, identifying meaningful places, relations, conflicts, and silences.

• Role rotation: participants alternate between filming, interviewing, editing, and sound recording, preventing technical hierarchies from concentrating power over images.

• Community-based curation: videos are collectively reviewed, titled, categorized, and geolocated before publication.

• Low-tech ethics: mobile phones and basic cameras are treated as valid tools, rejecting technical colonialism in favor of situated vision.

​

Videos are uploaded to community-controlled channels and geolocated on a digital map, transforming territory into a living, affective archive.

​

​

Counter-archive, displacement, and symbolic justice

​

Each video operates simultaneously as document and counter-document. While it records a specific moment in the social history of a place, it also resists the dominant representational regimes that reduce communities to statistics, victims, or objects of study.

​

Against official reports, institutional archives, and media narratives, Videocartografías Comunitarias constructs a counter-archive centered on dignity, practice, and self-representation. It offers a form of symbolic justice by shifting the focus from damage to presence, without denying the violence that structures these territories.

​

Work, authorship, and the right to narrate

​

Here, authorship is displaced from the figure of the artist as narrator to the design of conditions that enable collective narration. The work is not a single object, but a process distributed across bodies, territories, workshops, and digital interfaces.

​

Situated at the intersection of relational art, critical cartography, expanded documentary, and community-based practices, Videocartografías Comunitarias asserts a fundamental claim: the right of communities to be present in history as narrators of their own worlds.

​

Even as digital platforms decay and archives become fragile, what remains is the experience of seeing oneself on screen not as an object of representation, but as an active producer of meaning.

That experience—shared, situated, and embodied—is the work itself.

​